Tag: Trust in Business

  • If the Paying Customers Leave, You’re Already Done

    If the Paying Customers Leave, You’re Already Done

    I’ve been reading articles in the Dallas Morning News lately that feel even more unhinged from reality than they used to.

    Part of the problem is obvious. They don’t seem to employ enough editors. I read something a while back that more or less admitted they don’t review a surprising percentage of what gets posted online.

    What they do seem to employ is a lot of young people who think they’re there to save the world, without the life experience to realize they’re repeating feel-good ideas that don’t work in the real world.

    When you talk to people about this, they’ll usually say, “That’s why newspapers are going out of business. They’re not serving their audience.”

    That’s not really true.

    Newspapers were never truly in the news business. They were in the advertising business.

    More accurately, the eyeballs business.

    The reporting existed to attract an audience. The audience’s attention was the product. Advertisers bought classified and print ads to access it. That’s where the money was. Always was.

    It’s the same model Facebook and other online businesses use today. Anytime something is free or very cheap, you’re probably the product, not the customer.

    Even back then, plenty of reporters thought they were saving the world. From a business standpoint, journalism was a loss leader. It supported the real business, which was ads.

    At the time, those ads were a cash machine. Big enough that management could afford to indulge that delusion.

    Now the ads are gone.

    Nobody buys classifieds anymore. Circulation is down, so print ads don’t matter. The economic engine that supported the whole thing is dead.

    What’s left is a shell. And the people still inside it are often the ones who never really understood what business they were in.

    If there’s a lesson here, it’s simple. You have to know what business you’re actually in. And if that business no longer exists, you don’t fix it by pretending harder.

    You get into a different one.

    Real estate brokerage is what I do, but it isn’t my main business. I’m in the trust business. And I’m in the marketing business.

    When the market is roaring, anyone can look competent. Most of those people disappear when things get tough.

    But when you’ve built trust over decades with repeat clients, you can withstand market swings.

    You may not be looking to sell today. You may think you’re never going to sell.

    A surprising number of people who say that eventually do.

    The time to prepare for a big decision is when you’re not under pressure. It may never happen. But if it does, you don’t want to start from zero.

    I offer a free, no-obligation analysis on any non-residential property. It includes real sales relevant to your property, market trends, and nearby development information when applicable.

    It’s updated for free anytime you ask.

    And it comes from someone who does what he says, doesn’t exaggerate to get listings, and will still be in business if things change later.

    Would it hurt anything to take a look?

  • If You’re Not In The Trust Business, You Won’t Be In Business For Long

    If You’re Not In The Trust Business, You Won’t Be In Business For Long

    Awhile back I saw a Dallas Morning News headline on the so-called bathroom bill.

    Technically correct, but framed so narrowly it made the issue sound like it only applied to a sliver of people. In reality, it applies to everyone.

    Why write it that way? I can’t say for sure.

    My guess: to agitate certain readers and boost clicks.

    That’s the business they’re in.

    Not the news business so much as the engagement business.

    I even messaged the public editor about it. Pointed out the headline was misleading. His reply? Evasive. Acted like he didn’t understand my question. I explained again. Still nothing.

    Maybe he was right that I wasn’t clear. I mean, I don’t write for my business every day.

    (wait, yes I do).

    Fast-forward to this week. Same public editor writes a whole piece about… typos in headlines. “Went” instead of “gone.” “Polices” instead of “policies.” Important, sure — but is that really worth a full column and public apology?

    It reminded me of Jesus taking the Pharisees to task for tithing on their mint and cumin while neglecting the weightier matters. Grammar matters, but it’s not the real issue.

    Then came the real eye-opener: a line about improvements. Now, 98% of stories are reviewed by an editor before posting. Good, right? Except the number used to be… 28%.

    Come again? A major metro paper, calling itself the “paper of record,” admitting it didn’t bother to review over two-thirds of its stories just 6-7 months ago.

    And we’re supposed to see that as progress.

    Their explanation was cost. I’m sure it was.

    But if you’re really in the news business, accuracy isn’t optional.

    And if you’re really in the trust business, you don’t brag about fixing a gap that should never have existed.

    That got me thinking about my own work.

    Most folks would say I’m in the brokerage business.

    And that’s true. But more than that, I’m in the trust business.

    You can get news anywhere. You can get a broker anywhere. Both are commodities.

    The only reason someone picks me is because they believe I’ll shoot straight and protect their interests.

    And if that sounds crazy in today’s world — maybe it shouldn’t.